Blog

Daily writing prompt
How do significant life events or the passage of time influence your perspective on life?
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    In Myanmar, far north of the big city of Naypyidaw is the Sagaing Region. Life there felt slow, like a quiet river that forgets the sea it came from. People woke with the sun and lived by the seasons. Farming rice and beans was their breath, taught child to child, like a soft song passed down through quiet years, maybe broken only by the gentle buzz of market talk or a distant temple bell. Roads were small threads stitching villages together. Motorbikes zipped like quick thoughts. Bikes carried lives. Old ox carts rolled, heavy with time, the creak of their wheels a familiar sound. The big Chindwin River flowed, a brown mirror holding the sky in silence. The land felt safe, solid underfoot, like a promise whispered by the earth itself, a promise that would always be kept.But on Friday, March 28, 2025, after lunch, at 12:50 PM, the promise shattered like glass. Time itself seemed to stumble and break. A giant earthquake, 7.7 strong, woke up like a monster from a long sleep deep under Sagaing city. No warning. Just a sudden, terrible roar from deep below, a sound that filled the air and stole breath, swallowing every other noise. Then the crash of things breaking everywhere at once – wood splintering, glass exploding, walls collapsing. Screams began, sharp cries cutting through the unbelievable noise, voices calling names that were lost in the chaos.It wasn’t just shaking. It was the world tearing its own skin. The groan of bending metal, the sharp crack of wood snapping, the sickening thud of a brick hitting the earth. Buildings fell like playing cards in a careless hand, like secrets the wind scattered in a cloud of choking dust. Roads split open, showing black mouths of darkness underneath. Temples crumbled, holy places broken like ordinary toys a child grew tired of, the tinkle of small bells mixing with the rumble of falling stone. The ground became a shifting nightmare… amid the shaking and the dusty air, you could hear cries fade into weeping, short bursts of fear followed by a terrible, waiting silence, and then maybe another shout, “Mama! Where are you?”More than 2,886 people gone. Swallowed. Like stars blinked out in the sky. Over 4,500 hurt, carrying the earth’s anger in their bodies. 373 still missing, lost in the broken pieces of yesterday, perhaps still calling out unheard under the weight. These numbers are cold stones, but each one is a sun of warmth that set forever. A story ripped mid-sentence. A laughter dissolved into an aching silence that felt louder than any scream. An empty space at the table that echoes with the ghost sounds of what used to be.Hospitals became islands in a sea of pain, filled with the constant, low moan of the hurt. Tired doctors fought darkness with fading light in their own eyes, their quick, low voices urgent – “More bandages! Hold this! Quickly now!” The beep of machines, if there were any, struggled against the sheer scale of wounds. Outside, hurt people waited, their soft cries and whimpers mixing with the wail of distant sirens that started, a sound of help that felt too small, too far away.The world heard Myanmar’s silent scream. International aid began to move. The World Health Organization sent emergency medical kits. Countries like China, India, Russia, and the United States offered help—doctors, tents, water filters, warm words carried in cargo. But aid had to cross difficult roads, not only cracked by the earthquake but also by conflict. Myanmar was already bleeding from within. Some trucks were delayed. Some never reached. Even kindness faced roadblocks. Even mercy needed protection.Still, the small, stubborn flame of the human spirit did not go out. Hands, raw and bleeding, clawed at stone that was once home – the scrape and thud of digging, a desperate rhythm against the quiet despair. Shouts echoed into the rubble, voices raw with hope and fear, “Is anyone there? Can you hear us?” Food, suddenly precious like diamonds, was shared. Prayers rose like unseen birds into the dust-filled sky, soft murmurs against the backdrop of ruin. Then, a miracle no louder than a breath: a young man, 26, pulled from under the crushing weight of a hotel after five days that felt like lifetimes. Alive. Maybe they heard his weak reply first, a faint “Here… help…” cutting through the sound of shifting debris. A flicker in the ruins, weak and covered in the earth that tried to take him, but breathing. One single seed of life found in a field of grey ash. It was a tiny light proving that even when buried, life stubbornly whispers, “I am still here.”But one light does not erase the darkness. The earthquake didn’t just break homes; it broke the shape of the world inside people’s heads. Trust in the ground, trust in the quiet rhythm of days – it cracked wide open. Now, every shadow feels like the earth might split again. Every distant rumble, even a truck passing far away, sounds like the monster stirring, bringing back the memory of that first terrible roar. The quiet is no longer peaceful; it’s filled with listening, waiting for the next terrible noise. The world beneath their feet feels like thin ice over a deep, cold, waiting darkness. Safety is no longer a place; it’s a memory, a ghost of something they once knew without thinking.This is the earth’s hard lesson, spoken not just in roars and crashes, but in the long, echoing silence after. Life is fragile, a beautiful, thin glass ball we balance moment by moment. We build homes, we tell stories, we believe we stand on solid rock. But we are only guests on a spinning planet that dreams its own deep, ancient dreams, and sometimes, those dreams are of ruin. We are not safe because we are clever or strong. We are safe only by luck, like leaves floating on a vast, unknowing ocean. Until the current changes or the wave decides to rise. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    What makes you laugh? Some people laugh at jokes. Me? I laugh at my life. Clearly, it’s scripted by a drunk screenwriter who believes my brain is just an extra holding a lamp in the background scene. You know, the one who waves awkwardly at the camera by mistake.When people ask me, “What makes you laugh?” I simply say, my confidence. Yes, my confidence—the most loyal clown I’ve ever hired. Always shows up at the wrong moment, juggling flaming torches while shouting, “Relax, dude, we totally got this!” Then it vanishes the second disaster walks in the door.Allow me to introduce Exhibit A. Exam day at college. I strutted into the exam hall feeling like Einstein after three cups of coffee. I had studied physics all night—formulas, Newton, gravity, apples dropping dramatically. I sat down, smiled confidently, and opened the paper. Boom. Not Physics. Language. LANGUAGE! The class I’d ignored harder than spam emails offering free cruises.But guess what happened? Passed. Because apparently, the universe thought, “Let’s reward stupidity today, just for kicks.” Physics—the one thing I genuinely studied? It glanced at me coldly and said, “Oh, you thought we were friends?” Failed miserably. Beautiful. Tragic. Absolutely Shakespearean.Exhibit B. Another exam morning. My brain whispered gently, “Hey champ, you’ve studied enough. Celebrate with a movie.” So naturally, like the wise philosopher I am, I went. Morning show, popcorn, emotional scenes, tragic heroes—full cinema experience. Came back, exam time. My head still buzzing with dramatic dialogues and unresolved plot twists. Yet again, I passed. By this point, I’m convinced God outsourced my life to a comedy writer who’s secretly trying to win a bet.Honestly, my brain confuses me. One day it’s a profound philosopher pondering life’s meaning. The next, it’s a hyperactive circus monkey swinging wildly between bad ideas. But most days? It’s an exhausted goat standing alone in the rain, chewing on the same soggy thought over and over again.That’s exactly what makes me laugh. Not memes, not witty jokes, but this everlasting reality prank show titled “Me Trying to Be Serious About Life.” My brain has only one guiding rule: Why calmly stroll down the straight path when you can perform eighteen somersaults, land face-first into mud, and then confidently claim, “Yes, exactly as planned!”So yeah, laughter? Never chased it. It just trails behind me like an unpaid intern holding a clipboard overflowing with terrible ideas and regrets.So, tell me—has your brain ever gently pushed you off the cliff of stupidity, whispering lovingly that you’d totally fly? Or am I alone in being betrayed daily by my own neurons? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    We eat meat every day without thinking much. A piece of chicken, some beef, maybe lamb or fish. But we don’t stop to think deeply about where it really started. Not the supermarket shelf, but the actual beginning. We never ask ourselves how these animals lived, what they felt, or how their last moments were spent. Sometimes, I wonder—how many animals have become part of me? How many cows, goats, and chickens have built this one body of mine? A strange thought then comes to my mind. Maybe I’m not just made of meat. Maybe I’m also made of their fear, pain, and final breath. Am I a soul eater? That’s why I wanted to tell Daisy’s story. Because she had a name, and stories are better when they have names. Because we hardly ever hear their side. I was born during a thunderstorm. My mother moved slowly that day, heavy and tired. While other cows hurried to shelter, she laid down beneath a tree. Between the thunder and rain, I came into this world. My mother licked me quickly, racing against the lightning. I couldn’t see clearly, but I felt warmth. That was enough. The farmer found us later. He smiled gently. A small girl stood behind him, wearing yellow boots and hands covered in paint. She looked at me as if she’d found something precious the world forgot about. She touched my head softly and whispered, “I’ll call her Daisy.” I licked her finger, tasting trust. Her name was Lily. I remember that too. Lily visited me often. She gave me apples, talked endlessly, telling me about school, her dreams, and a lazy pet who loved to sleep. Once, she drew my picture, flowers in my hair, and promised nothing bad would ever happen to me. I believed her, because love makes promises believable. Seasons passed gently. Spring made the grass kind and whispering. I ran, jumped, felt the earth smile beneath my hooves. Summer brought heavy days, flies buzzing lazily around my ears. Fall felt like a gentle farewell. Leaves changed colors and fell, like quiet goodbyes. Winter turned the world white and silent, keeping us inside a warm barn. But it was a sad warmth, like a hug without love. I watched three years pass. And I saw other things too—like the truck. It arrived early, groaning as if tired of lying. The cows taken never returned. We wondered where they went, imagining farms with sweeter apples and softer grass. But older cows knew better. They spoke softly about the slaughterhouse. The truck wasn’t taking you somewhere nice; it was just taking you away. Then, one day, I became a mother. My body hurt, but my heart felt enormous. I licked my calf over and over, just as my mother had licked me. She was mine. But they took her quickly, before I even learned her voice. I cried until my throat burned dry. My milk filled me painfully, with no one to give it to. Machines pulled at me coldly, draining my warmth like I was a lifeless object. I stood still because that’s what you do when nobody cares why you hurt. And then my turn came. It was a summer morning, too bright and beautiful. They loaded me into the crowded truck. We pressed close, silently sharing our fear through skin. Outside, trees danced freely, and children laughed through sprinklers. The world was wonderfully alive, just as I was leaving it behind. The slaughterhouse was clean, cold, and white. Death wore a neat coat. We stood in a line, trapped between metal walls. One cow fell weakly, another lost control in fear. Workers looked away or wore headphones, music loud enough to silence guilt. One held a tool they said was quick and painless. But who asks those who die? He placed it against my head. I didn’t resist. All I thought was, Was I good? Click. Silence. But I wasn’t gone yet. I rose above, watching my body fall, blood spilling out, hands cutting me apart. They turned me into parts, peeling away my skin, taking organs, breaking bones. My fat melted into something someone would later enjoy without ever knowing it kept me warm in winter. Workers hardly spoke. One wiped his face, whispering he couldn’t do this anymore. Another stared at the floor like it told him a sad story. They looked tired in a way sleep could never fix. The worst part isn’t the killing, it’s pretending. Pretending it’s just meat. Pretending blood is just a mess. Pretending eyes don’t see you. They packed me in plastic, labeled, frozen, put on another truck. Cold, quiet, going everywhere and nowhere all at once. I wandered. Parts of me went to stores, restaurants, homes. Then one day, I found Lily again. She had grown older, sadder. She asked her mother softly, “Where’s Daisy?” Her mother hesitated, then said gently, “She went to another farm.” Another farm—a gentle lie wrapped as comfort. That evening, Lily’s mother cooked dinner. Steak, sizzling strong and familiar. Lily took a bite, pausing. “It tastes weird,” she said quietly. I watched her chew the piece of me that once trusted her. I wanted to ask her: Do you still draw pictures of me? Did I matter to you? If love cannot protect, what’s it really worth? If life is just something you buy, was it ever really mine? If kindness stops somewhere, who decides where? But I had no mouth—only heavy questions no one wants to hold. I looked at Lily once more. Her eyes had tears, but not for me. Just tired tears. Her mother washed dishes, life moved on quietly. And I… I faded into air. Like a whisper nobody hears, like a story nobody tells, like a name nobody remembers. I had a name. And I remember everything. When we eat, we don’t ask about the stories on our plates. We never ask about their souls. How many souls did you eat today? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Heroes or Just Good at PR? – Part 4: Andrew JacksonThe Man Who Treated America Like a Rental Car Andrew Jackson is the type of person history books don’t know what to do with. Half the country builds statues of him, and the other half dreams about knocking them down. Honestly, both sides make sense. Born in 1767 in a log cabin that sounds charming but probably smelled like sadness and wet wood. His dad died before he was born. His mom died when he was just a kid. Life handed him grief, anger, and the emotional stability of a broken vending machine. By 13, he was already fighting wars. At 14, he was a prisoner, getting slashed by a British officer for refusing to clean boots. That scar didn’t just stay on his face—it sunk deep into his personality. That one moment whispered, “This kid is going to wreck everything he touches and smile while doing it.” Later, he became a lawyer, a war hero, and the kind of guy who shoots people in duels but gets called brave. He owned a plantation filled with enslaved people. His résumé basically said: start fights, buy land, buy humans, become president. Confidence wasn’t his problem—stopping him was ours. He famously won the Battle of New Orleans after the war had already ended. He knew the fight was pointless but did it anyway. That’s the first clue. Anyone who wins fame from fights nobody needs usually ends up in history books for all the wrong reasons. When Jackson entered the White House, he didn’t unpack a plan. He unpacked revenge. He was America’s first true “burn-it-all-down” leader. Think of him as a guy who rents a nice apartment, breaks everything, and then calls it improvement. He destroyed systems, traditions, and even entire cultures. His biggest “achievement” was the Indian Removal Act. He called it progress. That’s like a thief stealing your wallet and telling you, “I’m teaching you financial responsibility.” Entire Native tribes were forced off their land. Jackson said it was for their own good—just what toxic people say right before ruining your life. Then came the Trail of Tears. Thousands forced to walk miles in freezing cold with no food, no shelter, and no reason besides greed dressed as patriotism. It wasn’t a trail. It was an open grave. Jackson didn’t just know—he simply didn’t care. He proudly owned a plantation called The Hermitage, home to over 150 enslaved people. He profited from their suffering, built his legacy on their backs, yet history remembers his name and forgets theirs. Jackson hated the national bank for being too powerful, too elite—so he destroyed it. Did he replace it with something better? Nope. Jackson’s logic was simple: If I don’t like it, I’ll burn it. That’s not leadership; it’s just a tantrum wearing a suit. He ignored the Supreme Court when they tried to stop him, basically saying, “You can’t ground me, you’re not my real dad.” Sound familiar? History loves reruns. Donald Trump later tried the same move, ignoring laws and judges, treating democracy like a video game where rules are optional. Same script, just worse grammar. Psychologically, Jackson was every angry social media comment turned human. He didn’t believe in boundaries. He believed in power. If he had a bumper sticker, it would read: “I’m not wrong. You’re just weak.” That kind of mindset never dies—it just finds new hosts. Philosophically, Jackson was a warning pretending to be a hero. He showed how easily cruelty gets applause when it dresses like strength. He didn’t build a better nation; he built a bigger image of himself and sold it as patriotism. And people bought it. They reelected him. They called him the voice of the common man—but only if you looked like him, voted like him, and stayed quiet. Everyone else got silence. Or worse. Instead of burying his legacy, we put him on the $20 bill. That’s like hanging your ex’s picture on your wall because they taught you what red flags look like. Jackson shaped history but also shaped trauma, and now we exchange paper reminders of it every day. Here’s something to think about: why do we remember the scar on his face but not the countless scars he caused? If hurting thousands makes you powerful, and power makes you a hero, then what does it say about us? Are we clapping for the man or the fantasy he sold? If history is a selfie, who’s behind the camera? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Heroes or Just Good at PR? – Part 3: The Man Who Discovered What Was Never Lost Christopher Columbus. Yes, the man who “discovered” America—like someone proudly inventing breathing while everyone else was already inhaling. He didn’t just stumble onto history’s stage. He fell face-first into someone else’s yard, planted his flag, and shouted, “Look what I found!” And strangely, we cheered. Humans have an odd habit of applauding confidently lost people. In 1492, Columbus sailed with three tiny ships, a lousy map, and an ego so huge it probably needed its own lifeboat. He aimed for Asia and hit the Bahamas. Did he admit the mistake? Nope. Instead, he confidently declared it India, like stepping into a bathtub and congratulating yourself for discovering the Pacific Ocean. He met the people living there—generous, peaceful folks minding their own business. Columbus reacted like an entitled house guest, eating their food, trashing the living room, kidnapping the family, then calling it hospitality. It’s like stealing your neighbor’s car and acting offended when they don’t thank you. Columbus named these folks “Indians,” a mistake that stuck around longer than a bad haircut from middle school. But why correct history when we can frame it neatly and call it tradition? He kept returning—four trips in total. Each visit brought more men, weapons, and fewer morals. He demanded gold. If the locals fell short, he cut off their hands, chased them down with dogs, or worse. It wasn’t exploration; it was shopping with violence instead of money. Philosophically speaking, Columbus followed the timeless wisdom: “If I take it first, it’s mine forever.” A thought pattern borrowed directly from toddlers fighting over toys and CEOs negotiating mergers. Psychologically, Columbus was basically a narcissist with a ship. The world was his mirror, and the people he found weren’t humans—they were opportunities. He didn’t notice their kindness or their communities, only how easy they might be to control. It’s like meeting a talented musician and instantly wondering how cheaply they’d perform at your party. In his diary, Columbus wrote how easy it would be to dominate these kind people. “They have no iron,” he bragged. “They’d make excellent servants.” Because who needs friends when you can have obedient workers? It’s like shaking someone’s hand and immediately imagining them mowing your lawn for free. Here’s the craziest part: Columbus never even stepped foot in what’s now the United States. Yet, America gave him parades, holidays, and entire cities bearing his name. That’s like thanking the mail carrier for your birthday gifts just because they rang the doorbell. Even Spain eventually got tired of him. They arrested him and sent him back home in chains—something textbooks often conveniently forget. We prefer the pretty version, with Columbus heroically planting a flag, not the awkward version where he’s handcuffed for being a terrible manager of stolen land. Columbus didn’t find a new world; he silenced the old one. He didn’t discover humans; he erased them. He didn’t deliver civilization; he delivered smallpox, swords, and suffering that lasted generations. It’s like showing up at a peaceful picnic with a bulldozer and calling it progress. So was Columbus a bold explorer or just history’s greatest PR stuntman, turning robbery into legacy? Was he a hero, or the first influencer, posting selfies in someone else’s backyard and calling it his own? History labels him legendary. Those who encountered him probably had a different title—something less printable. Before deciding, consider this: if someone broke into your home, painted their name on your door, claimed your fridge, and called themselves your savior—what exactly would you call them? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Let me say something wild: I bought my Tesla just to save money. Shocking, isn’t it? Nope, I didn’t buy it to hug trees or rescue melting glaciers. I was just tired of gas prices making me feel like I owned a private jet instead of a beat-up hatchback. Electric cars run on cheap electricity instead of overpriced dinosaur juice. Simple math. No drama is needed.But now, driving a Tesla is like tiptoeing through a minefield in sandals. I just wanted a smooth, quiet ride, not to become the poster child for some billionaire’s midlife crisis.The trouble started when Elon Musk got bored. He wasn’t happy just launching rockets or posting memes anymore. He decided to jump headfirst into politics—and landed right in Trump’s campaign wallet. Dropping $300 million (allegedly!) into politics isn’t just writing a big check. It’s more like declaring your team colors in a sports game nobody asked for. Suddenly, my Tesla isn’t just a car. It’s a walking, talking political bumper sticker, and I don’t even know what mine says.Watching Musk team up with Trump is like watching a superhero crossover gone wrong. They’re not saving the world—they’re playing Monopoly and we’re all losing money. Musk gets favors and big contracts; Trump gets tech-world street cred. And me? I get awkward stares and maybe some creative spray paint artwork in a Walmart parking lot.I used to love rolling into a charging station, feeling cool and futuristic. Now it feels like parking a giant neon sign screaming, “Ask me about my politics!” Don’t get me wrong—I doubt Elon wakes up thinking, “How can I ruin someone’s grocery shopping today?” But there I am, buying eggs, wondering if someone outside is keying my car out of anger, confusion, or just really bad aim.At first, I brushed off news about Teslas getting vandalized in the U.S., like swatting away annoying flies. But then it happened right next door in Hamilton, and suddenly I panicked. What was once a badge of pride turned into an anxiety magnet. I didn’t sign up for this when I bought my shiny electric soap bar.Now every time I park, it’s like spinning a wheel—will my car still be in mint condition, or will I find a nasty surprise? Daily errands feel like Russian roulette and trust me, that’s not the Tesla experience they promised in the showroom.Look, I respect the planet. I recycle. I avoid microwaving plastic. But buying my Tesla wasn’t a love note to Mother Earth—it was a breakup text to gas stations. If I wanted politics in my life, I’d just buy a bumper sticker, not a $60,000 electric skateboard with doors.So if you see me cruising around, please know: I’m not part of some tech-bro uprising. I’m just trying to get groceries without having to give a TED Talk explaining myself. I believe in efficiency, not emperors. I believe in charging cables, not chaos.I bought a car, not a whole political movement.And hey, if someone starts selling flameproof car covers that say, “Relax, I just wanted to save money,” please DM me the link. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Heroes or Just Good at PR? – Part 2: Thomas Edison Thomas Edison is that guy schools love to teach us about. You know, the one who “invented” the light bulb. The grand genius who played music on a phonograph and turned on the lights of the world, one shiny patent at a time. He’s the electric superhero in textbooks, casting long shadows—but maybe that’s because he always kept the spotlight aimed firmly at himself. But here’s a tiny truth Edison’s flashy bulbs never really lit up: did he actually invent all those cool things? Or was he just super good at scribbling his name faster than anyone else could shout, “Wait, that was my idea!”? Let’s be honest. Edison wasn’t dumb. Far from it. But he wasn’t the lone genius locked away in some basement. He was clever in a businessman kind of way. Edison was like a boss running a huge kitchen, where a room full of brilliant chefs cooked up ideas. He just showed up to taste the cake and take credit for the recipe. He wasn’t a lone wolf hunting ideas—he was the smiling shepherd making sure all his sheep stayed inside his fence. Then comes Nikola Tesla, the quiet Serbian-American genius nobody heard about in school. Tesla was the guy who whispered groundbreaking ideas instead of screaming them from rooftops. He dreamed of lighting the world without sending everyone a bill. Edison, on the other hand, saw every light bulb as a tiny cash register. Tesla’s idea was alternating current—AC, electricity’s express train. Edison’s direct current—DC, was more like a tricycle struggling uphill. AC flew across cities; DC barely crossed the street. If electricity was online shopping, Tesla offered free delivery. Edison made you pay shipping, handling, and a headache surcharge. When Edison saw he couldn’t win fairly, he went Hollywood-level dramatic. He started scaring people about AC, electrocuting animals publicly—dogs, horses, even a poor elephant—to make Tesla’s brilliant idea seem dangerous. Imagine trying to prove a point about safety by casually inventing public executions. Edison wasn’t just marketing fear; he was directing a horror movie, complete with popcorn-worthy electrocutions. He even helped cook up the electric chair—powered by AC—not because he cared about crime, but to brand AC as deadly. Imagine losing an argument, then inventing torture furniture just to win back your pride. That’s not genius—that’s reality TV-level pettiness. While Edison electrified animals to prove a twisted point, Tesla fed pigeons and struggled to pay rent. He died poor, forgotten, and alone. Yet his AC powers your life today—the lights, computers, everything. Edison’s DC? Well, it’s still hanging around like that annoying cousin who overstays their welcome at every family event. And still, history gave Edison the gold medal and Tesla a pat on the back after he’d already left the building. One man was loudly selling snake oil to applause, and the other quietly delivered the real medicine without ever seeing his face on the bottle. How did Edison become the poster boy of innovation? Simple. History isn’t a court judging truth; it’s a noisy auction, and Edison was shouting the loudest bids. He understood something Tesla didn’t—that people buy stories, not science. Edison had the printing press wrapped around his finger, and when you control the microphone, you control the memory. So ask yourself—did Edison invent modern life, or did he just trademark it? Was Tesla too pure, too honest, too quiet for history books that prefer shiny covers over accurate pages? The next time you flip a switch, remember—history isn’t written by winners. It’s written by people who could afford the ink. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Heroes or Just Good at PR? – Part 1: Winston Churchill You know him. The guy whose statue stands tall in London. The one who always looks like he’s about to say, “Bring me a cigar, and throw in half the world while you’re at it.” Books say he’s a hero. They call him Britain’s savior. The fearless lion roaring bravely in Hitler’s face.But what if the lion roared loudly only because it stole someone else’s lunch?Let’s rewind a bit. Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill arrived in this world in 1874, in a palace. Yeah, an actual palace—not some dusty little house. From day one, life handed him gold spoons, silver forks, and probably diamond bowls too. His father was a Lord; his mother, a rich American. Forget rags-to-riches. Winston Churchill’s story was riches-to-more-riches-to-super-famous.He wasn’t great at school, yet somehow slipped neatly into a military uniform. He went here and there—India, Sudan, South Africa—fought a bit, and wrote exciting stories. War, of course, looks wonderful when you hold the pen and not the rifle.Then came politics. Churchill entered as a Conservative. Then he hopped to the Liberals. Then hopped back to the Conservatives. He changed parties like people change TV channels when nothing good is on—restless, bored, always looking for something better.Now comes Gallipoli in World War I. Churchill thought his plan was genius. Reality disagreed. Thousands died. Churchill got sidelined. Normal people relax with movies or naps. Churchill relaxed by painting happy little trees and calm lakes. Good for him, I guess.Fast-forward to World War II—1940. Hitler danced across Europe. Britain needed someone loud. Churchill grabbed the microphone, speaking words that woke up a frightened nation. Even today, documentaries use his voice like catchy pop songs: “We shall fight on the beaches…”So far, sounds heroic, right? Hold on.Now we arrive at the chapter history books whisper. Or just conveniently skip.1943, Bengal in India. Europe had Nazis. Bengal had hunger. Millions starved. But wait—there was food. Lots of it. Yet Churchill’s government took rice meant for Indians. They fed British troops. They filled their warehouses. Bengal begged for help. Churchill replied casually, saying Indians “breed like rabbits.” Not exactly the speech you’d carve onto statues, huh?Three million people died. No bullets fired. No battles lost. Just hunger.But Churchill treating colonies badly wasn’t new. He always thought white people were on top. He believed in building empires by standing on others’ backs—literally.He even supported using poisonous gas on rebels in the Middle East. “I strongly favor using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes,” he once said. Nope, that’s not the villain from your latest action movie. That’s your hero, proudly staring from British banknotes.In 1910, Churchill sent troops to crush coal miners protesting in Wales. In 1945, he backed bombing Dresden, Germany, turning thousands of civilians into smoke. But guess what? None of this stained his legacy. Win wars, write well, and history helps you clean your bloody hands.He didn’t free colonies. He never said sorry. Instead, he wrote thick books, painted calm pictures, and made fiery speeches. For these “talents,” they handed him a Nobel Prize in Literature in 1953.Because hey, if you’re good with words, maybe they’ll forget the blood.Here’s my view about history. Real history should tell facts without taking sides. It should be neutral, like a referee who doesn’t care who wins. But sadly, that’s rarely how it works. History usually picks sides. It’s either in love with someone or hates them completely. Churchill is just one example.Now pause and think carefully. Hitler killed millions. Churchill caused millions to die too, just fewer. One is called pure evil. The other, a brave hero. Both saw some people as superior. Both caused suffering. One built death camps, the other built an empire that did pretty similar work. So, what decides a monster from a hero? Is it simply the number of dead bodies, or just smart PR work?Here’s your puzzle: Was Churchill the courageous leader who saved Britain from Hitler’s darkness? Or was he a cold-hearted man who let millions starve while proudly waving his British flag?Can one person be both heroic and horrible at once?Or was Churchill just incredibly good at selling himself?I won’t give you the answer. I just brought you the facts. History builds statues for some, erases others. So maybe before praising, we should always ask ourselves:“Praise… for whom?” Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Daily writing prompt What tattoo do you want and where would you put it? Some people get tattoos to remember happy days or important moments. Others get them just to look cool. Me? I’m thinking about getting one that looks like the factory sticker nobody asked for, slapped onto my skin. “Made in [Birth Year] – Best Before [Already Expired].” Yeah, like the forgotten milk carton hiding behind fresher stuff in the fridge, wondering if someone might risk it—or if today’s the day it finally goes down the drain. Life feels exactly like this sometimes: we’re all stamped with an invisible expiry date. And let’s be honest, I passed mine ages ago. But here I am, still on the shelf, pretending I haven’t gone sour yet. I’d add extra notes, of course—little disclaimers, because life forgot to send me the manual. “Some Assembly Required,” for starters. I’ve been trying to piece myself together for decades, and trust me, there are parts left over. I’m pretty sure they were important, but somehow I’ve managed without them (at least that’s what I keep telling myself). Then there’s “Contents May Vary.” Some days I’m sweet and calm, other days I’m bitter like black coffee left overnight. My mood is basically a roulette wheel spun by caffeine, how much sleep I got, or if someone cut me off in traffic. Each morning, it’s a surprise even to me. My personal favorite addition: “Now with 20% More Anxiety!” This update wasn’t something I asked for, but life seems eager to keep improving me, whether I like it or not. It’s as if I’m a smartphone forced into updates overnight, waking up more confused and worried than before. I might even go all out with nutritional facts. “Confidence: 5% – shrinks fast when people make eye contact.” “Energy Levels: 2% – barely functional after three coffees.” And let’s not forget “Overthinking: 250%,” which really just means lying awake at night replaying awkward conversations from ten years ago, because clearly, that’s helpful. Psychologists say tattoos are a way to show who you really are inside. In my case, it’s less about expressing myself and more about openly admitting I’m a limited edition, slightly defective human. Instead of hiding behind filters and fake smiles, I’m putting it all out there—right on my skin. It’s also strangely philosophical. I’m basically admitting the truth that everyone tries to avoid: we are temporary. We arrive brand-new, slowly wear out, then quietly expire. The difference is, I’m not pretending. I’m openly labeling myself as “Out of Warranty,” no returns allowed. Will people laugh at it? Probably, because deep down they feel it too. Will it make people uncomfortable? Absolutely—but that’s okay. Sometimes truth stings a little. Will my parents shake their heads, sighing in quiet disappointment? Definitely. But they’ve been doing that for years anyway. And that’s exactly why I want this tattoo. To remind me—and everyone else—that life is short, messy, and imperfect. We’re all just slightly questionable cartons of milk, trying our best to be fresh long after our “Best Before” date. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Every morning, I stand in front of the mirror like a confused time traveler, wondering how I got here and why my hair looks like an abandoned bird’s nest. The answer should be right there in my reflection, but nope—just a blurry, slightly judgmental figure staring back at me like it knows all my secrets. I wipe the mirror dramatically, expecting some great revelation. Maybe today’s the day I finally understand myself. But all I get is a streaky mess and an even more disappointed-looking version of me. Seriously, is my reflection silently judging me, or is that just the angle? People with their “morning routines” and “life plans” make it look easy. They wake up knowing exactly who they are, where they’re going, probably with a green smoothie in one hand and enlightenment in the other. Meanwhile, I’m over here playing a daily game of Guess That Silhouette. Am I a deep thinker? A lost soul? A walking reminder that I should drink more water? Who knows! I try to clear things up—wipe harder, stand at a different angle, blink aggressively like that’ll somehow fix my existential crisis. But just like the mirror, my sense of purpose remains fogged up. I’m a mystery even to myself. Maybe I was never meant to have definition. Maybe my whole existence is just one big steamy coming soon trailer, where even I don’t know what’s next. And you know what? That’s fine. Maybe being a foggy mirror is better than being one of those hyper-clear, magnifying mirrors that expose every pore and every bad decision. I’d rather stay a little mysterious—just enough that people squint and think, “Hmm, there’s something deep going on there,” when really, I’m just waiting for the fog to clear so I can find my toothbrush. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    I used to think winning arguments made me smart. I believed if I had the best facts and the loudest voice, I would win. I argued like a warrior, waving my words like swords. I thought every debate was a battle, and I had to win at all costs. But after every “victory,” I stood there alone, like a guy clapping at the end of a movie when everyone else had already left. My “opponent” was gone, my “friendship” was damaged, and all I had left was an awkward silence. Then it hit me—I had spent my life fighting for people who didn’t even know I existed. I argued about actors like they were my best friends. I threw facts at people, defending my favorite celebrity like they paid my bills. But the truth? That actor wouldn’t even notice me if I was on fire in front of them. I was like a fan screaming in an empty stadium, cheering for a team that didn’t even know I was there. And politics? That was even worse. I argued about politicians as if they cared about me. I believed my words mattered, like my favorite leader would show up at my house, shake my hand, and say, “Thank you for fighting for me!” Meanwhile, they were probably having fancy dinners together, laughing while we argued over them. It was like watching two drivers argue about whose rich boss was better. They screamed, insulted each other, and nearly threw punches. Meanwhile, their bosses shook hands, smiled, and drove off in fancy cars. And the drivers? Fired. Left on the sidewalk, still mad, still shouting, still unemployed. That’s when I finally understood—this is not my war. I was fighting battles that had nothing to do with me. I was defending people who wouldn’t even let me use their bathroom if I needed to. It was like getting upset over a stranger’s burnt toast—watching it from across the street and somehow feeling personally attacked by the smoke. Now, when someone tries to argue with me, I just smile, nod, and say, “You are right.” They expect a fight, but I don’t give them one. They stand there confused, holding their anger like a broken phone with no battery. And here’s the truth—arguing about other people’s lives is like trying to do heart surgery on a plastic doll, in a house that isn’t yours, using a spoon. You can try, but it won’t change anything. Peace is easier. Let the rich and famous fight their own battles. I’ll be here, drinking coffee, free from arguments I never needed to be in. And maybe, just maybe, I’ll finally accept that ice cream isn’t a vegetable. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    A few days ago, I stumbled across a YouTube video about something called The Tibetan Book of the Dead. At first, it sounded strange and mysterious. So, of course, I went down the rabbit hole and started doing my own research. What I found felt like discovering a hidden door in an old house—one that leads you somewhere you’ve never imagined before.The Tibetan Book of the Dead is basically a guidebook. But unlike guides that tell you how to fix a car or bake bread, this guide is about what happens after we die. It says that dying isn’t just a simple ending; it’s more like stepping off one bus and waiting for the next one. During this waiting period, which lasts up to 49 days, your consciousness goes through strange experiences before being reborn again.Now, why 49 days? That’s not a random number. In many traditions, this period is special. For example, some cultures mourn or pray for exactly seven weeks after someone passes away. It’s as if these weeks are a mysterious window—time to travel between one life and the next. Somehow, this number feels important, deeply tied to the rhythm of our lives, even if we don’t fully understand why.The Tibetan Book describes this journey after death in detail. First, at the exact moment you die, you see a bright, peaceful light. It’s like stepping into a dark room and someone suddenly turns on a flashlight. This light represents pure reality, free from illusions. If you recognize it as your own true nature, you instantly become free. But most people miss it. They get confused or afraid, just like someone caught by surprise might close their eyes to shield themselves from brightness.Then things get even more interesting. Over the next few days, you start seeing visions. Some visions feel like beautiful dreams, peaceful and gentle. Others turn scary—like nightmares chasing you in the dark. The catch is, none of these visions are real. They’re just reflections of your own mind, showing you your deepest fears and desires. If you realize this, you’re free. But if you forget, panic, or get swept up by emotion, the cycle of rebirth continues.Eventually, your consciousness moves to the last step—looking for a new life. The book says you’ll see future parents and feel a powerful pull toward them, drawn in by emotions you can’t control. The mind picks a new life, and the whole process starts again. It’s like stepping back onto another bus without knowing exactly where it’s going, but hoping it’s headed somewhere better.One thing that really got my attention was this: the book itself was hidden away for centuries. Why hide such important information? Maybe because people weren’t ready for it. Imagine knowing exactly what happens after death—would it change how you live your life? Maybe the monks who hid the book knew that powerful knowledge without preparation could cause more harm than good, like giving car keys to someone who never learned to drive.Or perhaps the book was hidden because society runs better when death remains a mystery. After all, we live our lives chasing dreams, money, happiness—what if we knew none of it was real? Would life lose meaning, or would we actually find freedom?The more I think about it, the more I wonder if the 49-day journey after death is also about life itself. Maybe we’re always in a kind of Bardo, dealing with illusions, fears, and choices every day. Maybe the visions and fears described in the book are not so different from the challenges and illusions we face daily. Are we learning to navigate these illusions or are we just stumbling blindly through them?Honestly, I’m not even sure if I believe all of this. And I’m definitely not sure if I follow its teachings. But I can’t deny one thing—it’s fascinating to consider. It makes me ask myself, if death is truly just a mirror of how we’ve lived, then what are we really preparing ourselves for every single day?And maybe that’s the real point of this hidden treasure: not just to understand death, but to rethink life itself.So here are some things I wonder:If death is about seeing through illusions, how often do we fall for illusions in our daily lives?Why does the idea of death and rebirth appear in so many cultures around the world?What does the number “49 days” really mean, and why does it show up in different traditions?Are we always living in some kind of “Bardo,” navigating through confusing illusions, desires, and fears?I might think about these questions a little longer. How about you? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    It all began with a comment on one of the best blogs I follow. We engaged in a back-and-forth discussion, and I was taken aback by the blogger’s unwavering belief in God. Not the casual kind of belief that wavers in the face of hardship, but a solid, unshakable faith that seemed immune to doubt. That conversation unsettled me—not because I disagreed, but because it forced me to confront a question I had avoided for years. Did I ever truly believe in God? Or was my faith like an old coat passed down through generations—worn because it was given, not because it fit? As a child, belief wasn’t presented as an option—it was an instruction. The existence of God was as unquestionable as gravity, as inevitable as the sunrise. God was omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. He rewarded the righteous and punished the wicked. To disbelieve was not just wrong; it was dangerous. Faith wasn’t a path I chose; it was a road I was placed on, with no signposts to question where it led. But something never sat right with me. While others seemed to embrace faith like a warm hearth in winter, mine always had a cold, metallic edge. It was obligation, not devotion. My prayers weren’t whispered conversations with the divine; they were desperate SOS signals, sent out of fear. I didn’t love God. I feared Him. Yet, life has a way of throwing contradictions in your face. I have seen moments that felt too precise, too intricately timed, to be mere coincidence. When I lost hope, when all logical outcomes pointed to failure, something—some force—intervened. And in those moments, I felt a presence. Not a voice, not a figure in the clouds, but something beyond explanation. Was that God? Or was it just the mind’s way of assigning meaning to randomness? And then there are people. I have seen godliness in them—not in the ritualistic sense, but in the way they extend kindness with no expectation of return. In my darkest moments, strangers have lifted me when I thought I would crumble. And I wonder: if God exists, is He a being, or is He simply the collective goodness of humanity? But this belief—this fragile, conditional belief—collides head-on with the brutal reality of suffering. I have seen innocence punished, cruelty rewarded, justice trampled. The idea of a just God wavers when you witness the randomness of pain. If there is divine justice, why does it operate with such agonizing inconsistency? There is an old saying: “If you do wrong, the king will kill you instantly. But God—He will break you slowly, piece by piece, until you beg for death.” That aligns well with karma, but reality often defies even karma. Evil men thrive. Good people perish. Where is the grand equation in that? And then there’s my own hypocrisy—because when I suffer, I still call out to God. When pain grips me, I plead for divine intervention. But once the storm passes, I slip back into indifference. God, for me, is not a constant presence but an emergency exit. He exists only in my suffering. So now, I face the question I’ve long avoided: Am I a believer, or am I an atheist? I do not know. I exist in the gray space between conviction and skepticism. Some days, I lean toward faith, sensing an unseen order in the universe. Other days, I see only chaos, indifferent and cold. Perhaps belief is not a rigid structure but a shifting tide, rising and receding with experience. Perhaps God is not a figure watching from above but a reflection of our hopes, fears, and unanswered questions. Or perhaps there is no God at all, and we simply project meaning onto an indifferent cosmos because the alternative—true randomness—is too terrifying to bear. I may never have an answer. But maybe that’s the point. Maybe faith isn’t a solid ground, but the act of walking in the fog—unsure of the next step, yet moving forward anyway. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Silence is never truly silent. I once believed silence was nothingness, a mere absence of sound. But silence is not empty. It is dense, oppressive, an abyss filled with echoes of everything I tried to escape. It does not vanish when ignored. It lingers, waiting, knowing that eventually, I will have no choice but to surrender to it. That is why I run from it. I scroll endlessly, drowning in distractions, not because I seek entertainment but because I fear what lurks in the stillness. I flood my surroundings with noise, voices, and empty conversations—not because I crave company but because silence demands something from me that I am not ready to give: confrontation. It strips away the illusions I have built, dismantles the narratives I have carefully crafted, and forces me to acknowledge the uncomfortable truth—I am both the wounded and the wound, both the betrayed and the betrayer. Silence is patient. It does not chase. It does not demand. It simply waits, knowing that when the last distraction fades, I will be left alone with nothing but the raw weight of my own existence. And when it comes, it does not arrive as peace; it arrives as reckoning. It does not speak in whispers but in echoes—echoes of the past, of the things I should have done, of the choices I should have made. It forces me to stare into the reflection of who I have become, to see not just the scars left by others but the ones I have inflicted upon myself and upon those who once trusted me. Time is often mistaken for a healer, but it is not. Time does not erase guilt; it merely buries it under layers of rationalization. My regrets are not scars that have healed; they are wounds that have festered in silence. The betrayals I suffered pale in comparison to the betrayals I have committed—words spoken in anger, love discarded carelessly, hands that reached for me while I turned away. I have been the architect of my own ruin, the executioner of my own peace. And silence knows this. That is why it waits. And yet, I convince myself I have let go. People say “move on” as though pain is an object one can discard, as if regret is a weight that can be put down. But letting go is not freedom; it is a struggle, a war waged within the mind, where the self becomes both prisoner and executioner. To truly let go, I would have to strip myself of everything I have built to survive. I would have to face the truth that the person I want to be and the person I have become are not the same. And that realization is unbearable. I walk through life believing I am alone in this. That I am the only one carrying the unbearable weight of a mind that refuses to forget. But I see it in others too. I see it in their restless eyes, in their laughter that doesn’t quite reach their soul, in the way they drown themselves in work, in distractions, in temporary escapes. They, too, are haunted. They, too, are running. They, too, fear that if they stop, even for a moment, silence will consume them whole. So perhaps silence is not the enemy. Perhaps silence is the only thing that has ever told me the truth. Perhaps, instead of fleeing from it, I should allow it to break me—to dismantle the illusion of who I think I am so that I may finally see who I have become. Because if silence is never truly empty, then perhaps, neither am I. Perhaps my pain, my regrets, my guilt, and my shame are not punishments but mirrors—reflecting back the truth I have tried so desperately to avoid. And maybe, just maybe, it is only in accepting this truth that I can finally be free. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Quantum mechanics is weird. Really weird. It says tiny particles can be in two places at once, things can be connected across galaxies without touching, and somehow, just looking at something can change what it does. Scientists are still confused, but don’t worry—the internet has already figured out how to make money from it. Thanks to quantum computing (which most of us don’t understand but pretend to), quantum physics is all over the news. Experts say it could change medicine, cybersecurity, and basically everything. But let’s ignore that. The real discovery? YouTube gurus have found a way to use quantum mechanics to make you rich, fix your love life, and turn you into a magical being of success. For a small fee, of course. Apparently, you don’t need skills, effort, or even a functioning brain anymore. Just align your quantum vibrations, unlock your subconscious, and boom—instant wealth. It’s the perfect scam. Take a complicated science, mix in some spiritual nonsense, throw in a dramatic title like “THE SECRET THE ELITES DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW”, and watch the views (and cash) roll in. Poor Einstein wasted his life on relativity when he could’ve just started a self-help channel. Imagine him in a YouTube thumbnail, pointing at an equation with his mouth wide open. But here’s the best part—you don’t need to pay anyone to “live a quantum life.” You’re already doing it. In fact, you’ve been a quantum physics genius this whole time. You just didn’t know it. Ever stood in front of a menu, unable to decide between a burger and tacos? Congratulations, you’ve experienced quantum superposition. Until you choose, both realities exist—one where you eat the burger, one where you eat the tacos. The moment you decide, one timeline collapses, and the other becomes your dinner. Somewhere in the multiverse, an alternate version of you is enjoying the meal you didn’t pick. Hope they’re happy. Ever felt your partner’s bad mood hit you out of nowhere, even when they’re not around? That’s quantum entanglement. In science, two particles can be so connected that whatever happens to one instantly affects the other, no matter how far apart they are. In relationships, this is why you just know they’re mad before they even send that “K.” text. Spooky action at a distance. Ever had money disappear from your wallet without explanation? That’s quantum tunneling. In theory, particles can pass through barriers they normally shouldn’t. In reality, this is how your cash mysteriously vanishes. Or how teenagers somehow sneak into the house at 2 AM without opening a door. Ever asked your spouse “What’s wrong?” and got the classic “Nothing” response? Welcome to quantum uncertainty. Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle says you can’t measure two things at once—like a particle’s position and speed. In real life, this means “nothing” both is and isn’t something at the same time. The more you try to figure it out, the worse it gets. The safest move? Back away slowly. So, next time some online guru with a suspiciously perfect smile tries to sell you a “quantum wealth activation course,” remember: the only thing they’re manifesting is your money into their bank account. You’re already living quantum physics—you just don’t need to pay $99.99 to realize it. Now go enjoy your quantum-powered life. And if you’re still stuck choosing between a burger and tacos, don’t stress. Somewhere in the multiverse, you made the right choice. Just not here. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Alright, humans. We have crammed the planet full, wasted all the resources, and made robots take our jobs. Now what? We have three options. We can keep ignoring it until nature fixes it with disasters. We can try dumb sci-fi stuff like moving to Mars, which won’t happen for almost any of us. Or, we can actually use our brains and solve it like grown-ups. Let’s pretend we choose the smart option. But how do we fix overpopulation without starting a war?First, we need to flip the rewards system. Right now, the more kids you have, the more “free stuff” the government promises. That is backward. The new system should be simple: fewer kids equal VIP treatment. If you have one child, you get free education and unlimited WiFi. If you have two, you get a standard life. But if you have five? Congratulations, you have unlocked the “Exile Package.” You can go live on a deserted island. If having a huge family is a choice, then paying for it should be your problem, not everyone else’s. We also need to change how we teach. If we want change, we can’t rely on stubborn adults. We have to start with the kids. History books should say, “See that war? That was because of too many people.” Math problems should only feature small families. By the time these kids grow up, they will look at a family of ten and wonder if it’s a circus act.Another big problem is retirement. Too many people have kids just so someone will take care of them when they are old. We need to fix that. If we had better pensions and robots to change our diapers, people wouldn’t need to breed their own nursing staff. And while we are at it, let’s stop pretending that “more kids equals more happiness.” That is a marketing scam. More kids usually means more stress, less money, and a higher chance that one of them will write a “Mommy Dearest” memoir about you. We need to shift our thinking from “the bigger the family, the better” to “the smaller the family, the smarter.”Of course, we can’t forget the billionaires. Since they are so obsessed with space, let’s help them out. We can send them—and anyone who insists on having ten kids—straight to Mars. It’s not exile; it’s a “voluntary relocation.” They can enjoy the red dust while the rest of us actually fix Earth. Finally, maybe it’s time for a license. You need a license to drive a car or go fishing, but anyone can raise a human? That seems wrong. To get a “Parenting License,” you should have to pass a test. prove you can change a diaper in thirty seconds, and survive forty-eight hours with a screaming toddler. If you can’t handle a plastic baby for a week, you definitely aren’t ready for a real one.These problems won’t fix themselves. Either we control our numbers, or nature will do it for us—and nature’s version involves famines and viruses. So, we can do this the easy way or the hard way. But we better decide fast, because Mother Earth has been sending warning emails for centuries, and I don’t think she is going to be polite for much longer. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Welcome back, fellow humans. In Part 1, we threw a party for overpopulation. Now, let’s admire the glorious disasters it has already given us—and the even bigger ones we are brewing for tomorrow. Because why settle for just traffic and high rent when we can have water wars, no food, and robots stealing our jobs? Let’s jump right into the dumpster fire.Who doesn’t love a two-hour drive to a place that is only ten kilometers away? Traffic isn’t a problem anymore; it’s a lifestyle. Crawling is now faster than driving. Scientists probably call it “evolution in reverse.” But don’t complain—it’s just nature making you more patient, whether you like it or not.And if you think the roads are crowded, just wait until you try to find a house. Population is up, which means house prices are up. If you want a home, you might have to sell an organ, work for sixty years, and maybe—just maybe—you will afford a closet. The future of housing isn’t looking great. We will probably end up in “Human Storage Units,” which are basically breathable bookshelves.Then there is the job market. Overpopulation plus robots is a genius combination. Artificial Intelligence is stealing jobs faster than we can make babies. Soon, the only careers left will be things like “Professional Line-Waiter” or “Traffic Therapist” to help people cry about their commute. Or maybe “Oxygen Collector,” where you stand in line and try not to inhale more than your fair share.Meanwhile, the planet is clearly over us. Summers used to be just hot. Now they feel like “Satan’s Microwave.” Cities are drowning, forests are burning, and winter is basically a free apocalypse. Your air conditioner runs all day, but let’s be honest—it’s just a fan spinning lies.We are quickly getting to the point where we fight over the basics. Water, food, and air are becoming luxury items. Soon, you might have to pay fifty dollars for a bottle of water and then fight someone for the last drop.But don’t worry! The billionaires have a plan. They are going to save humanity… by leaving. They will hop on their spaceships to Mars while we stay here in traffic. You will look up from your government-issued nutrient paste, see a rocket fly by, and realize you are stuck here fighting over potatoes.We made this mess. Overpopulation is a choice, but nature’s reaction isn’t. Earth is tired. It feels like the landlord is getting ready to kick us out.So, congratulations to us. We have successfully crowded the room, eaten all the snacks, and broken the furniture. The only question left is: What happens when the lights go out? Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    ​Congrats, humans. We did it. We won the game. If the goal was to pack this planet like a can of sardines, we get the gold medal. While other animals are just trying not to go extinct, we are smashing population records every single day. ​Who cares about traffic that moves slower than a snail on a coffee break? Who cares if water is running out? More people means more party, right? ​Wrong. ​A long time ago, people had twelve kids because, honestly, life was hard. You needed a whole soccer team just to run a farm. But modern medicine fixed everything. We survive. We grow old. We take up space. But we never stopped cranking out babies. ​It’s like we are playing musical chairs, but nobody ever takes away a chair. We just keep adding more people to the game until we are all sitting on each other’s laps. ​We tell ourselves funny stories to justify it. We ask, “Who will take care of me when I’m old?” But let’s be real—your kids will be too busy paying off their student loans to change your diapers. Or we say, “I need a boy to carry the family name!” Trust me, the family name will be fine. Nobody is checking. ​Some people think more kids equal more love. It also equals more noise, more mess, and a grocery bill that looks like a phone number. If babies came with a warning label, it would be terrifying. You are basically signing up for a lifetime subscription to anxiety. Sleep becomes a distant memory, like a dream you once had in the 90s. And eventually, they grow up and blame you for everything anyway. ​The governments love it, though. They treat having kids like a rewards program. “Have another one! We will give you a tax break!” They don’t tell you that the tax break buys about three days’ worth of diapers. They promise free parks (which are crowded), free schools (which are packed), and a bright future (which is currently melting). ​We are heading toward a world where “personal space” is a myth. Future apartments will be the size of a closet. You will have to book an appointment just to look at a tree. But don’t worry—the billionaires say they will save us. They want to fly us to Mars. Because that’s the solution, right? Ruin one planet, then hop in a rocket and go ruin the red one. ​We don’t need more humans. We need better humans. We need to stop treating overpopulation like a high score in a video game. We need to teach the next generation that it’s okay to stop. It’s okay to have just one. It’s okay to have none. ​Because right now, Mother Earth is looking at us like a tired landlord. She is thinking, “I love you, but the house is full. You are eating all the food and trashing the living room. If you don’t calm down, I’m going to have to evict some of you.” ​And her eviction notices look a lot like floods, fires, and viruses. ​So, maybe take a breath. Look around. We have enough people. What we need is a little more space, a little more water, and a lot more sanity. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    Daily writing promptYou’re writing your autobiography. What’s your opening sentence?View all responses I arrived in this world with nothing—no money, no plan, not even a single useful skill—and somehow, against all odds, I’ve managed to hold on to that winning streak. Like this:Like Loading…
  • Kalyanasundaram Kalimuthu
    History is just a fancy way of saying, “someone wrote things down in an interesting way.” A king loses a battle? “A tragic fall from power.” A scientist makes a mistake? “A turning point in human discovery.” Some guy trips on a rock? “And thus, the course of civilization was forever altered.“Meanwhile, in your own life, you might just be a person who once spilled coffee on yourself at work. But what if, instead of admitting to clumsiness, you called it “a moment of deep realization about the fragility of mankind’s creations”? Suddenly, you sound like a philosopher rather than someone who can’t hold a cup properly.You say nothing dramatic ever happened in your life? Well, that depends. Did history actually happen, or was it just written really, really well? What if every legendary warrior, every so-called genius, and every great leader was just some guy who got lucky, but their biographer happened to be a world-class storyteller?A king who lost his empire? “Betrayed by fate, he faced an insurmountable storm.“(Translation: He made dumb decisions, ignored warnings, and got kicked out.)A scientist who messed up? “In his relentless pursuit of truth, he dared to challenge the limits of knowledge.“(Translation: He forgot to carry the one.)A philosopher who “reshaped human thought”? “He spent years in deep contemplation, questioning the essence of existence.“(Translation: He sat under a tree.)Now, apply this to your own life.That time you overslept? “A bold defiance of society’s rigid schedules.“(Translation: You hit snooze twelve times.)The time you got lost on vacation? “An unplanned journey of self-discovery, where every wrong turn was a lesson from the universe.”(Translation: You refused to ask for directions.)The time you spent an hour looking for your sunglasses while they were on your head? “A symbolic battle between perception and reality.“(Translation: You’re a disaster.)That time you forgot someone’s name five seconds after meeting them? “A tragic commentary on the impermanence of human connections.“(Translation: You weren’t listening.)That awkward conversation where you tried to walk away but both of you kept stepping in the same direction? “A highly choreographed yet unspoken ritual demonstrating the delicate balance of human interaction.“(Translation: You did the mirror dance and lost all dignity.)That moment when you confidently explained something and later realized you were completely wrong? “A fearless exploration into the limitless possibilities of misinformation.“(Translation: You talked nonsense, and now you’re just hoping nobody fact-checks you.)That time you sent a message to the wrong group chat? “A bold experiment in social communication, pushing the boundaries of interpersonal connection.”(Translation: You just sent your work gossip to your family.)Maybe the real secret is this: nothing is dramatic until it’s written down. Once you start documenting your life like history, even your smallest hardships, mistakes, and embarrassing moments become grand events. Not because they were rare, but because they happened to you—and you, my friend, get to decide how they’re remembered.So go ahead, exaggerate. Embellish. Play with words. You’re not lying; you’re just following in the footsteps of every historian ever. If history can turn questionable figures into heroes and minor events into world-altering moments, then you can absolutely turn your struggle to open a jar into a “monumental test of human resilience against the unyielding forces of nature.“(Translation: You banged the jar on the counter twice, gave up, and handed it to someone stronger.)And that time you made toast?“A culinary masterpiece, a testament to the human spirit’s ability to harness the very fires of creation.“(Translation: You made toast.) Like this:Like Loading…

4 thoughts on “Buried Voices in a Broken Land”

  1. As if the people of Myanmar had not been through enough. Bless their souls and give them strength.

    1. Sometimes, it feels like the ground in Myanmar holds too many tears already. And still, people rise, barefoot on broken stone, carrying stories that refuse to die. May their strength be the kind that even the earth remembers.

  2. My heart trembles at this. Such loss…such devastation…such tragedy. How fragile the ground beneath us…the skies above us… can be. I lift Myanmar in prayer- its people, it’s children, It’s healers. I carry their sorrow gently in the depths of my heart.

Leave a Reply